Site icon almostadoctor

Mechanical Back Pain

Introduction

Mechanical back pain (aka non-specific back pack, sometimes previously termed lumbago) is a term used to describe musculoskeletal lower back pain. It is extremely common, with about 80% of those in Western Society experiencing it at some point in their lives. It is particularly common in those working in manual labour industries. It accounts for more days of sick leave than any other disorder.

It is the most common cause of lower back pain, but care must be taken to rule out more serious differentials when presented with this very common complaint.

It is also a common cause of chronic pain.

It can be:

There are many myths held both by the general population, and also even sometimes be medical professionals! Common myths and misconceptions about back pain include:

This excellent resource from the Curtin University shows how doctor / patient communication styles can impact on patient beliefs and the management of back pain (takes about 10 minutes).

The general principles of management including reassuring patients that there is not a serious underlying pathology, and that they will not cause further damage by continuing to be active and exercise. You should actively encourage them to be active, and dispel the above myths.

 

Risk factors

For chronic lower back pain with no apparent cause
  • Smoking
  • Low socioeconomic status
  • Poor working conditions
  • Cardiorespiratroy disease
  • Large number of children (for men too!)
  • Psychological disorders (inc. anxiety and depression)
  • Long periods of sitting (e.g. at a desk) at work are NOT significant

Psychological factors – yellow flags – these are a set of risk factors for chronic back pain based on psychological beliefs. Patients who exhibit these beliefs are more likely to suffer from chronic back pain:

  • Activity, exercise and pain are harmful
  • Extended rest will help symptoms
  • Problems at work
  • Time of work / compensation due to injury
  • Overprotective family
  • Lack of social support
  • Unrealistic treatment expectations – e.g. does not attend all physio sessions, does not perform home exercises

Pathology

  • Due to damage to the muscles / soft tissues of the lower back, as a result of posture, physical activity, lifting etc.
  • Thought to most commonly be due to disorders of the facet joints of the spine which then in turn cause damage to the surrounding tissue
  • There is a cycle of muscle spasm >> pain >> spasm >> pain
Lumbar Vertebrae

Presentation

Investigations

Are usually unnecessary it is typically a clinical diagnosis.

Differentials

Differentials are broad and I highly recommend reading the lower back pain article for an overview of assessing lower back pain.

Differentials include:

Management

Usually self limiting. Without intervention:

The crux of advice is to encourage patients to maintain normal activities as much as possible. Bed rest should be avoided and may worse pain  and prolong recovery.

Lifestyle advice

Analgesiais useful to prevent the muscle spasm >> back pain cycle.

Further medications – if muscle spasm is particularly troublesome, antidepressants (particularly TCAs) may be useful. Diazepam has been used traditionally as a ‘muscle relaxant’ but the evidence for its efficacy is extremely poor, and is should be avoided, especially due to risk of addiction, drowsiness and other side effects.

Physiotherapy may be useful in the acute stages to decrease muscle spasm (and subsequent pain), and is useful in the longer term to improve muscle conditioning and reduce the chances of future flare-ups

Preventative measures

Additional therapies – many patients may consult a chiropractor or osteopath for manipulation / massage but this is no more effective than other methods of rehabilitation

In my own practice I tend to avoid the recommendation of chrioparactors and osteopaths. They usually fill the same medical need as physiotherapists, and there are many excellent chiropractic and osteopathic practitioners out there, however, their training is typically not as “scientific” as that of a physiotherapist and there are some who also peddle pseudoscientific, homeopathic or downright unscientific practices and beliefs. If a patient already has a good relationship with one of these practitioners, and has had good results, I tend not to go against their preferences, but if a patient is looking for advice on who to see, I would generally recommend a physiotherapist over a chiropractor or osteopath. Some of the techniques employed by chiropractors and osteopaths may include spinal manipulation and massage. Whilst this often provides short term pain relief it does not treat the underlying causes of back pain and has not been proven to be beneficial in the long-term.

Specialist referral

Surgery

Lower back pain in pregnancy

References

Read more about our sources

Related Articles

Exit mobile version